Just another ghost in the machine.
This tumblr is science, world affairs, video games, technology, cinema, electronic & rock music, art, nature, writing, language, and introspection. Summary: the profound to the absurd.
Kredu tiujn, kiuj serĉas la veron. Dubu tiujn, kiuj trovas ĝin. -André Gide
Let’s get this apocalypse started.
I’d say the chances of missile strikes are now less than one in ten. The sudden turn of events has already led the Syrian government to reverse its longstanding policy of denying that it possesses chemical weapons, a situation that would have Monty Python-like possibilities if not for the daily horrors. That move suggests the better possibilities of diplomacy. …
[E]ven if the plan works, Syria will be no closer to the fall of Assad or to his negotiated departure. The killing will go on. Death by gas might be taken off the table, but children and other human beings, by the thousands, will still be pulverized in indiscriminate shelling and burned to death by incendiary devices. There will be more to celebrate in Washington and at the United Nations than in Homs and Aleppo.
In the strange period since August 21st, when the poison gas attacks took place, the White House has seemed incapable of strategic thinking. The State Department seems incapable of coherent communication. Republicans who never raised a question about Iraq are now in full flight from the use of force because they don’t like the Commander-in-Chief. The United Nations can’t bring itself to condemn chemical weapons regardless of who’s using them. Assad’s war crime has turned into Obama’s embarrassment. Everything is upside down; nothing seems to be working as it should.
Although, if you’re Russian and not heterosexual…
Maybe he made some good points in the abstract, but it sounds too sculpted, accommodating (e.g. appeal to ‘God’). Basically, this is disingenuous, coming from Putin. Be hard to convince me that he doesn’t believe his ideal Russia is exceptional above all else.
Shot of John McCain playing some iPhone poker game during the 3+ hour Senate hearing regarding the Syria situation earlier today.
Seems an apt metaphor, no? Disregarding or not focusing on details or other arguments, and instead engaging in a game of (high stakes) poker…
(Source: Washington Post)
Obama to seek congressional approval for military action in Syria
President Obama will seek approval from US Congress for military action in Syria, he announced Saturday from the White House Rose Garden.
"We are the United States of America," Obama said. "We cannot turn a blind eye to what happened in Damascus.”
Follow the latest at Breaking News.
Photo: NBC News
The interesting thing he said was that attacking Syrian targets was “not time sensitive”. This—all of it—seems like a huge political gamble for Pres. Obama, based on the history of this story.
Cue people (neocons) calling Obama weak for not exercising executive authority and instead seeking some semblance of debate and consensus. The questions on my mind: what if Congress doesn’t end up agreeing with him? Can Assad move some ‘targets’ around without them being tracked? Although unlikely, what if he decides to just start unloading chemical weapons like crazy before the Congressional debate?
In contrast to today’s wrenching debate over whether the United States should intervene to stop alleged chemical weapons attacks by the Syrian government, the United States applied a cold calculus three decades ago to Hussein’s widespread use of chemical weapons against his enemies and his own people. The Reagan administration decided that it was better to let the attacks continue if they might turn the tide of the war. And even if they were discovered, the CIA wagered that international outrage and condemnation would be muted.
It has been previously reported that the United States provided tactical intelligence to Iraq at the same time that officials suspected Hussein would use chemical weapons. But the CIA documents, which sat almost entirely unnoticed in a trove of declassified material at the National Archives in College Park, Md., combined with exclusive interviews with former intelligence officials, reveal new details about the depth of the United States’ knowledge of how and when Iraq employed the deadly agents. They show that senior U.S. officials were being regularly informed about the scale of the nerve gas attacks. They are tantamount to an official American admission of complicity in some of the most gruesome chemical weapons attacks ever launched.
What was John Kerry saying about how evil and universally unacceptable chemical weapons were the other day? Hmmm… anyway, the moral of the story is: any values a country professes to have or uphold are effectively bogus, because they will always go against them if they’re in the way of their perceived self-interests at the time.
Breaking news: Syrian forces fired mortars on a Turkish town along their shared border that killed 5. Turkey responded by firing at “Syrian targets”. So reports CNN’s Ivan Watson.
If Turkey gets actively involved, is this then the beginning of the end of Assad, if it hasn’t already been set in motion?
A pretty good article with some interesting history tidbits by Fouad Ajami (although I’ll admit I’m not the best judge of this material, but I’ll pass it along anyway). Also, I just heard him in the background on CNN speaking to this topic, and he said something interesting: he wondered aloud rhetorically—why all the manifested anger over such an insignificant, awfully-made film in the Arab world when Bashar al-Assad is slaughtering hundreds of muslims every day in Syria? Where’s the manifest outrage over that? Obviously, he believes the recent outrage is not merely a byproduct of framing by the Western media; rather, it’s real and significant. That to me implies that he doesn’t believe it’s a simple case of media bias that has the media covering the recent protests directed towards the US rather than cover the outrage in the Arab world directed toward Assad’s regime (because it simply doesn’t much exist). However, I’m sure the disdain for Assad is still there; I just don’t know relatively how much remains and what the potency of it is.
In any case, he has some ideas about the recent anger that he speaks about in the article.
A Syrian rebel covers a fellow fighter carrying the body of his brother, killed during a battle in the Saif al-Dawla district of Syria’s northern city of Aleppo, amid heavy street fighting between opposition and government forces on August 29, 2012. Zac Baillie / AFP - Getty Images
I called an old friend the other day, dialing the number somewhat sheepishly. He’s a senior adviser to the Iraq government and I knew what to expect when he answered.
First, he reprimanded me for not calling enough and hardly visiting. I’ve been away too long. You can’t do that, not to your friends. What’s so difficult about calling? he asked.
I apologized, asked about his children, his health, if he’s having success in quitting smoking, and offered the only excuse I could think of: “I’ve been busy with the Arab Spring.”
“The Arab Spring?” he said. “What’s that? There’s no Arab Spring anymore. That’s over. It is now a big struggle for power.”
He may have been acting like an insistent grandmother, but he was right. The Arab Spring is over. The days of the protesters with laptops and BlackBerrys in Tahrir Square are long gone.
Instead, a much bigger struggle is underway, one that goes back centuries that is both a regional battle for dominance and an epic tug of war between Sunnis and Shiites for control of the Middle East and the Prophet Muhammad’s legacy.
— Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan, in the aftermath of a Turkish recon plane being shot down by Syria
Syrian rebels absolutely obliterate a government tank with a lucky RPG hit, as they are allegedly gaining ground, strength.